EVE Search - C-J6MT Siege News, day 1.

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

C-J6MT Siege News, day 1.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Obivan Efa The Machines	Posted - 2006.08.06 07:27:00 - [1] Originally by: Yazoul Samaiel I fought aginst RA myself and it is not "supposed" it is the following: -RA abuse the logon log off mechanism. -RA use tons of WCS on their ships. -RA run complexes on daily basis with logon traps to stop any one else from stopping them to run the plex. No one who plays the game right and is not a 2 time griefer would ever respect these kind of tactics sicne they are all based on exploitation and once they get nerfed RA Will Disband. Anyway RA wacked Tons of Coaltion ships by the looks of it so congrats for that victory although i would say that the lag was the one who dealt the final blow but thats something we all go through so it was a victory for RA never the less. Respect? Funny to hear from the Coalition who fights 15 to 1 about respect and honesty... Furthermore Coalition loses battle after battle even have great numbers advantage over it's rival... It offends Coalition... Leave RA their space and sign a NAP, so RA will do plexes in their own territory and will not bother urs... ____________________________ Die, but perish! - viking's war-cry
Obivan Efa The Machines	Posted - 2006.08.06 07:57:00 - [2] Originally by: Yazoul Samaiel So many alliances and corps have piled aginst just out of the fact they hate their play style which is based on exploitation that earns them victory after victory in several battels ! Exploits? If it so ask Dev's fix it... I remember days of drone exploits - a lot of exploits with Drone-to-POS and Drone-to-BLOB-Lag... that was exploits.. Look at RA's movies at movie section with Capitalship fights and so on and u will see fair fights and respectfull victories... I'm sick of exploits talks...It's all seems like lame excuse... ____________________________ Die, but perish! - viking's war-cry
Obivan Efa The Machines	Posted - 2006.08.06 11:14:00 - [3] Originally by: Aeon Yakati I find it surprising to see so many people hammer on the 15 vs 1 statistic while totally 'forgetting' the advantages a POS defender has here. With current POS mechanics and the proper timing (of strontium) I personally could keep an alliance like BoB occuppied shooting POS for several weeks at least. And that's just me and the POS then. If I were to be the CEO of a dedicated 50 man corp, those few weeks would be extended considerably. Therefor my respect goes to the coalition who keep on trying despite the immense advantages a devoted POS alliance has here. It is clear the POS mechanics are not working out as intended and heavily favour the rich (# of POS) and (a few) devoted POS managers with alarmclocks. CCP: Randomize the Reinforced time. But this conflict lasts for a loooong time near a yaer as I know... And Coalition seting their POSs too and RA killing that POSs.. So what's the point? RA with 200+ active pilots can fight Coalition POSs but Coalition can't fight RA POSs even with much larger capital fleet? Maybe the key for victories in such war not the number of pilots but tactics and brain work? ____________________________ Die, but perish! - viking's war-cry
Obivan Efa The Machines	Posted - 2006.08.07 06:42:00 - [4] Originally by: Leo McGarry Why is anyone trying to engage the Russians in conversation? 'cause they can't beat Russians in game ____________________________ Die, but perish! - viking's war-cry
Obivan Efa The Machines	Posted - 2006.08.07 13:46:00 - [5] Originally by: Gunship I think if downtime was move to 18:00 eve, or did not exist it would move the ballance. LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!1111 U rocks dude!! DT is a russian exploit for sure - the only thing prevents Coalition's victory... Lol ____________________________ Die, but perish! - viking's war-cry
Obivan Efa The Machines	Posted - 2006.08.07 14:24:00 - [6] Originally by: Rover Vitesse You are such an RA fanboi I would be embarressed if I were in RA. Cheerleaders should be left on the sidelines. Actually I'm playing EVE for a long time but have never feel any special love to RA... quite the contrary.. because of different motives.. But RA vs. Coalition activities are making me RA's true fan And those Coalition member comments always make me laugh... We need to do a selection of such comments for our scions. ____________________________ Die, but perish! - viking's war-cry
Obivan Efa The Machines	Posted - 2006.08.07 16:34:00 - [7] Originally by: La Tortura I would suggest you leave LV and join one of more successfull alliances that had done the similar jobs - had taken out defended enemy POS'es - in the last few weeks. They'll gladly show you how this boring work could be done. Leaving LV and joing RA maybe? ____________________________ Die, but perish! - viking's war-cry
Obivan Efa The Machines	Posted - 2006.08.08 09:20:00 - [8] Edited by: Obivan Efa on 08/08/2006 09:23:00 EVE is changing... Those times then corps with large BS fleet have ruled are passed... U can't just come with a blob in the system and take it in a several hours... Enemy system must be sieged... Siege supposed to be hard, long and exacting... not just come-jump-press F1,F2,F3..-win Siege is a hard work but POS defence is a hard work too... The prise for such work - system or region. And those terms should be accepted. I understend the Coalition... Such sieges can be bored to death, hard and long... thats true So there are 2 exits.. 1) Coalition goes for such siege.. with allday round campings, full blockades for weeks, hard strikes on POSes with big losses and so on.. 2) Coalition signs NAP with RA with mutually acceptable terms. As I can see RA is different from RA more then year time ago... I think that RA has better organisation and more responsible leadership now. All is up to u. ____________________________ Die, but perish! - viking's war-cry
Obivan Efa The Machines	Posted - 2006.08.08 09:37:00 - [9] Lags are out of terms for sure... Lagging is bad for all.. I agree.. But we can nothing to do with this. Bringing 300+ gang u create lag by urself and for urself... It's all 'bout "blob-jump-kill doctrine".. such things will have less use in new EVE game terms... Siege can't be done in 1-2 days in such cases... that's the point.. If u'll be able to take system in 1 day u'll be able to lose it in 1 day too.. We saw such things in the past. ____________________________ Die, but perish! - viking's war-cry
Obivan Efa The Machines	Posted - 2006.08.08 11:56:00 - [10] Originally by: Rover Vitesse The art of setting up a L POS and defending it has got so high now (specifically RA, and well done to them for this) that there is no way to take down an RA "death-star" POS. If u like analogy with Star Wars... than I think that RA is more like "Rebel Alliance" now and The Coalition is like "Galactic Empire".. Small Red Rebel Alliance using The Force stands against Huge Galactic Coaliton... ____________________________ Die, but perish! - viking's war-cry

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.